When AI Tools Fail, UX Is Usually Missing

When AI Tools Fail, UX Is Usually Missing

We’ve all been there. You’re trying to return a product or request a specific change to a booking. The FAQ page doesn’t cover your situation, so you search for a phone number to talk to someone directly. But instead of finding a human point of contact, you’re met with a chatbot.

This wouldn’t be such a frustrating experience if AI agents were consistently reliable. But in many cases, businesses are rushing to implement AI with the assumption that intelligence automatically equals efficiency, and efficiency automatically equals better user experience. The result? Conversations that leave us confused, unheard, or ready to give up altogether.

AI has the potential to remove friction from digital interactions. In theory, it allows users to skip layers of navigation and access what they need immediately. But that promise only holds if the interaction itself is meaningful and usable. Every touchpoint with AI is an experience in itself, and like any other part of your product or service, it can be good or bad.

Why UX Design Should Be Involved from the Start

AI is already transforming how we interact with digital products. From chatbots and recommendation engines to intelligent writing assistants.

But as AI systems become more central to how users experience products, user experience designers can’t just be brought in at the interface layer. They need to be involved earlier, particularly in how these systems learn.

Training data is the foundation of every AI system. It determines what the model knows, how it speaks, and who it serves, either well or poorly. For chatbots in particular, training data defines the tone, knowledge, and personality of the bot.

If UX designers aren’t involved in shaping that data, the system risks becoming technically correct but contextually wrong or emotionally off-key.

A Chatbot Example

Imagine you’re designing a customer support chatbot for a healthcare provider. If the model is trained solely on internal documents, call transcripts, or generic FAQs, it may provide answers that are technically accurate but cold, confusing, or unempathetic.

Now imagine that UX designers are involved from day one. Here’s what changed.

• Curating the Right Training Data

UX teams help select examples that reflect real user concerns, emotional tone, and diverse communication styles. They can also identify and exclude outdated or overly technical language

• ‍Designing for Empathy and Tone‍

In sensitive fields like healthcare, tone matters. A good UX designer ensures that the AI doesn’t just answer questions, but does so in a way that builds trust.

• ‍Identifying Edge Cases and Bias‍

UX designers are trained to look for the exceptions. They think about accessibility, cultural context, and inclusivity, helping AI systems avoid repeating bias or overlooking minority user groups.

‍

The Experience Is the Product

Even the most advanced AI will fall short if users don’t trust it, understand it, or feel comfortable interacting with it. That is why training the AI is not just a technical task. It is a design decision.

As chatbots evolve from rule-based scripts to generative AI with fluid, humanlike dialogue, the need for UX input becomes even more critical.

UX and AI Have More in Common Than You Think

The process of training a large language model (LLM) has surprising parallels with the UX design process. Both are ultimately about learning from people in order to build systems that serve them.

‍

‍

Both processes involve understanding human needs, exploring possible solutions, testing and refining based on real-world use. They simply approach the challenge from different directions, one through behavioural design, the other through pattern recognition and prediction.

Final Thoughts

UX and AI are not just compatible. They are interdependent.

One is about designing with humans in mind. The other is about learning from human data. The more we integrate these approaches, the better the outcomes will be, not just for users, but for the trustworthiness of the AI itself.

If you are a UX designer, you do not need to learn how to build models from scratch. But you do need to be part of the conversation about how they learn, what they learn from, and who they are designed to help.

The future of AI is not just about intelligence. It is about experience.

‍